Around this time each year, conversations resurface lamenting the loss of Christmas traditions, particularly Jonkonnu. Too often, these reflections amount to little more than nostalgic fodder — a reminder that we once practised something kool as a culture, without moving much beyond that acknowledgement. Many Jamaican readers will recognise the name, some may remember the costumes or recall childhood encounters with masked figures in the streets, but fewer can explain where the tradition came from, what it meant, or why it mattered beyond spectacle.
That quiet fading is happening across several of our cultural traditions. In Jamaica, deeply meaningful practices are increasingly reduced to occasional performances, festival features, or historical references rather than lived traditions. When this happens, the loss is rarely sudden; it is slow and often goes unnoticed. Traditions do not disappear because they are irrelevant — they disappear when their meanings are no longer understood, taught, or practised. In other words, when we stop caring.
What Jonkonnu Was — And What It Meant
Jonkonnu also known as Jonkonnu, Junkanoo or John Canoe, is one of Jamaica’s oldest performance traditions, rooted firmly in the Christmas season. During slavery, Christmas Day, Boxing Day and New Year’s Day were among the few holidays allowed to enslaved Africans, creating a rare window for communal expression.
From its earliest records in the eighteenth century, Jonkonnu combined masquerade, music, dance and procession. Bands moved through towns and villages, accompanied by drums, fifes and rattling instruments, performing characters such as the King and Queen, Pitchy Patchy, Horse Head, Cow Head and Belly Woman. Masks concealed identity, speech was often whispered, and performance unfolded in public space.
Scholars have long noted that Jonkonnu emerged from layered influences. African masquerade traditions, with their emphasis on masking, ritual movement and communal meaning, were central. At the same time, many Africans brought to the Caribbean had already been shaped by Afro-Iberian Christian cultures, where festive processions, kingship symbolism and Christmas rituals were familiar. These forms were further transformed under Caribbean slavery, creating something neither purely African nor European, but distinctly Afro-Caribbean.
Why Jonkonnu Still Matters
Jonkonnu was never just entertainment. It functioned as a cultural system that held history, identity and meaning. Christmas provided the ritual container, but the performances themselves allowed for inversion of hierarchy, satire, movement across space and communal affirmation.
Over time, many of these functions were eroded. After Emancipation, missionary influence, civic restrictions and respectability politics discouraged practices viewed as pagan or unruly. Later, economic pressures, changing entertainment tastes and the rising cost of costumes and instruments made participation difficult. What survived often did so in rural pockets or through organised cultural events rather than everyday community practice.
Today, Jonkonnu is more likely to appear at festivals, competitions or heritage showcases than in the streets where it once thrived. While institutional efforts to revive the tradition, including government-backed programmes and cultural funding, are important, they often struggle to move beyond visibility towards continuity.
Preservation Requires More Than Display
Preserving culture is not the same as archiving it. Museums, festivals and history books play a vital role, but they cannot substitute for practice. When traditions are reduced to staged performances for audiences, their deeper meanings are easily lost.
Active preservation begins with knowledge. Understanding why and how Jonkonnu started, what it meant for Jamaicans at the time, and why it mattered creates the conditions for relevance. From knowledge comes respect. From respect comes participation. And from participation comes continuity.
This does not require freezing traditions in time. Cultural practices evolve, and they must be allowed to do so. What matters is that evolution remains connected to meaning rather than severed from it. Teaching young people the stories behind the masks, the significance of the characters, and the historical role of Christmas as a time of communal expression allows traditions like Jonkonnu to live rather than merely survive.
View this post on InstagramA post shared by Emancipation Park Jamaica (@emancipationparkja)
Choosing Continuity
Jonkonnu is not a relic. It is a cultural inheritance that requires care. Its decline is not inevitable, nor is its preservation the responsibility of cultural institutions alone. It depends on whether communities value understanding as much as performance, and teaching as much as celebration.
Cultural loss rarely announces itself loudly. It happens through neglect, misunderstanding and silence. What we choose to explain, practise and pass on will determine whether traditions like Jonkonnu remain part of our living culture or fade quietly into memory.
Preservation, ultimately, is a choice.
